Issa Amro : Israele: prendi nota - Il NYPD non ha ucciso il terrorista di Manhattan
Extra-judicial
killings don’t only deprive the suspect of their right to due process –
a crucial feature to any functioning democracy.
forward.com
Ho guardato
con orrore, come il resto del mondo, l’ attacco terroristico a Manhattan martedì 31 ottobre. Sono stati segnalati otto morti, più di 15 feriti,ma Saipov non era tra i morti. Un ufficiale di NYPD gli ha sparato nove volte , quando un proiettile lo ha colpito nell'addome l'ufficiale ha smesso di sparare. Sarà ora il sistema giudiziario a
giudicare il suo crimine .
Quel processo
è cruciale come abbiamo visto con i fratelli Tsarnaev, condannati per
l'attacco perpretato durante la maratona di Boston.
Per me, un palestinese di Hebron occupata, sembra quasi impossibile
comprendere. Il terrorista non è stato ucciso sul posto? Sono
riusciti a prenderlo vivo?
E’ così antitetico all'approccio di
Israele.
Il 22
settembre 2015 ho visto come Hadeel Hashlamon, 18 anni, ha attraversato il
rivelatore di metallo all'ingresso del checkpoint di Shuhada Street a Hebron. Ha
estratto la borsa da sotto il suo hijab,ma quando ha saputo che sarebbe stata ispezionata da un uomo, si è voltata per uscire dal retro del checkpoint. Rapidamente e senza
alcun motivo il soldato le ha puntato il suo fucile.
Qualche
momento dopo era morta immersa in una
pozza di sangue , a pochi metri dall'uscita.
È stata colpita con 10 pallottole e poi è stata portata via senza alcun trattamento medico.
I soldati
hanno affermato che ha cercato di pugnalarli, anche se non hanno mai mostrato
il coltello. Noi abbiamo delle immagini dell'incidente,
sappiamo cosa è successo: una donna terrorizzata è stata uccisa mentre cercava
di sopravvivere un altro giorno alle pistole, alle ispezioni e alle umiliazioni del checkpoint.
Ma anche se avesse
cercato di pugnalare il soldato come sostenevano i soldati pesantemente
protetti e armati , c’era bisogno di sparare per uccidere? Non avrebbero potuto
semplicemente prenderla in custodia, utilizzando una delle molte armi e
tecniche non letali a disposizione dei soldati israeliani?
L'omicidio
extragiudiziario non solo priva il
sospetto del diritto al processo dovuto – un elemento cruciale per qualsiasi democrazia funzionante,ma
priva la società stessa della giustizia,
senza la quale i diritti di tutti non sono veramente protetti.
Mentre
talvolta c'è una minaccia imminente di morte che deve essere
soddisfatta con la forza letale , il
presunto crimine di Hadeel non presentava questa particolarità. Se fosse stata colpevole di un delitto, l’ accusa avrebbe
dovuta essere provata . Non doveva essere uccisa.
E l'uso letale
della forza dovrebbe essere indagato in
modo trasparente . Nel frattempo il soldato che ha
ucciso Hadeel è libero. Non è mai stato
arrestato o ritenuto responsabile in alcun modo per l’uccisione mortale di un civile.
Non molto
tempo dopo l'uccisione di Hadeel, nel marzo del 2016, Alor Azaria è stato ripreso
da una macchina fotografica mentre
sparava ad Abdel Fattah al-Sharif agonizzante
a terra, ferito e incapace di muoversi .
A differenza dei bambini palestinesi condannati fino a cinque anni in un carcere militare per
aver semplicemente lanciato pietre, Azaria
è stato condannato a 18 mesi di carcere. Manifestazioni si sono svolte in tutto Israele a suo favore Nel mese di settembre, la sua pena è stata
ridotta da 18 a 14 mesi.
Ho quasi
perso la mia vita in un ‘ uccisione
extragiudiziale. Mi trovavo vicino al posto di controllo di Shuhada Street vicino all’insediamento
di Beit Hadasah – Un colone , mentendo,
ha detto ai soldati che avevo un coltello.
Probabilmente
sapevano che era una bugia. I soldati israeliani di Hebron sono regolarmente
informati su di me e sul mio impegno sperimentato per la non violenza. Tuttavia
i soldati hanno puntato le loro armi per
sparare.
Ero
terrorizzato. Ero sicuro di morire. Mi sono inginocchiato nella
speranza che non mi avrebbero sparato . Ho parlato a loro in ebraico, usando un
tono calmo e sottomesso.
" Non
ho un’ arma nascosta . Non ho alcuna arma da nessuna parte ",ripetei più
volte .
Queste sono
le abilità necessarie per sopravvivere all’occupazione : parlare correntemente in ebraico, essere
sottomessi per disinnescare la situazione, restare calmo di
fronte alla morte. Non tutti hanno queste abilità,ma così ho salvato la mia vita e sono stato fortunato .
Troppi
soldati in Israele e poliziotti in America sembrano sparare prima
e poi se mai, porre domande .
È stato così
sorprendente vedere il NYPD trasportare
un ferito e non un morto -Saipov ora è detenuto .
Come persona
impegnata nella vita umana, sono contento che Saipov sia stato portato in vita.
L'atto di odio e di terrorismo commesso è
stato terribile,ma le agenzie statunitensi che cercano di
impedire il prossimo atto di terrore sicuramente trarranno vantaggio da lui
ferito, piuttosto che ucciso.
Gli omicidi
extragiudiziali privano i cittadini dello stato di diritto e causano danni
irreparabili alle società che li fanno .
Come
qualcuno che vive nella città più occupata della Cisgiordania, dove le strade
sono divise tra ebrei e musulmani e i posti di blocco aumentano costantemente, so che solo
l’ uguaglianza porterà alla rottura del
ciclo di violenza e darà a tutti noi la
sicurezza e la pace.
Issa Amro è
un difensore dei diritti umani che vive a Hebron.
Israele: Prendi nota - Il NYPD non ha ucciso terrorista di Manhattan Read more: https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c
Israel: Take Note — The NYPD Didn’t Kill Manhattan Terrorist
I watched in horror along with the rest of the world as a terror
attack unfolded in lower Manhattan on Tuesday, October 31. A twenty-nine
year-old from Uzbekistan named Sayfullo Habibullaevic Saipov
intentionally plowed into bicyclists and pedestrians before finally
crashing into a school bus and brandishing two imitation firearms. Over
the next hour, fatalities began to be reported: first six men and women
dead, and then eight dead, plus 15 wounded.
But Saipov himself was not among the fatalities. An NYPD officer shot at him nine times, and when a bullet hit him in the abdomen, disabling him from causing further harm, the officer stopped shooting. He will now be forced to account for his crime through the justice system.
That due process is crucial, as we saw with the Tsarnaev brothers, convicted of the attack on the Boston Marathon.
But for me, a Palestinian watching from occupied Hebron, it felt almost impossible to comprehend. The terrorist wasn’t killed on the spot? They managed to apprehend him alive?
It was surprising because it feels so antithetical to Israel’s approach.
On September 22, 2015, I watched as 18-year-old Hadeel Hashlamon walked through the metal detector at the checkpoint entrance to Shuhada Street in Hebron. She pulled out her bag from under her hijab for the soldier to search. When instructed that she would be searched further, and knowing that it would be by a man, she turned around to exit at the back of the checkpoint. Quickly and without any reason I could see, a soldier pointed his rifle at her.
Moments later she was lying dead in a pool of blood on the ground of the checkpoint, just a few feet from the exit. She was shot with 10 bullets and then left there without any medical treatment.
The soldiers claimed she tried to stab them, though they never produced a knife. And because we have pictures of the incident, we know what actually happened: A terrified woman was killed as she tried to navigate another day of checkpoints, guns, searches and humiliation.
But even if she had tried to stab the soldier as they claimed, did the heavily protected and armed soldiers need to shoot to kill? Could they not just as easily have taken her into custody, utilizing any of the many non-lethal weapons and techniques available to Israeli soldiers?
Extra-judicial killings don’t only deprive the suspect of their right to due process – a crucial feature to any functioning democracy. They deprive the society itself of justice, without which no one’s rights are truly protected.
While sometimes there is an imminent and present threat of death that needs to be met with fatal force, Hadeel’s alleged crime was not that. If she were guilty of a crime, she should have been tried, not killed.
And the use of fatal force should be transparently investigated in every civilian case. Meanwhile, the soldier who killed Hadeel remains free. He has never been arrested, tried or held accountable in any way for the deadly shooting of a civilian.
Not long after Hadeel’s killing, in March 2016, Alor Azaria was caught on camera shooting Abdel Fattah al-Sharif dead as he was lying on the ground, wounded and unable to move. Abdel, 21 had approached the Tel Rumeida military post with the purpose of carrying out a knife attack. He had already been shot and wounded and was totally immobilized when Azaria walked over to thim and shot him dead. In contrast to Palestinian children who receive up to five years in military prison for simply throwing stones, Azaria received only an 18 month prison sentence. Rallies were held across Israel in support of him. Since beginning his prison term, he has been furloughed to spend Jewish holidays with his family. In September, his sentence was reduced from 18 to 14 months.
I myself almost lost my life to an extrajudicial killing. I was near the Shuhada Street checkpoint by the Beit Hadasah settlement when a settler lied, telling the soldiers that I had a knife.
They probably knew it was a lie. Israeli soldiers in Hebron are regularly briefed on me and my tried and tested commitment to pure nonviolence. Nevertheless, at the first excuse, the soldiers cocked their weapons to shoot.
I was terrified, knowing what was likely to come. I was sure I was about to die. I quickly lowered myself to my knees in the hope they would not shoot me. I talked to them in Hebrew, using a calm, submissive tone.
“I have nothing hidden on my back. I have no weapon. I have no weapon anywhere,” I said over and over.
These are Occupation survival skills — being fluent in Hebrew, knowing to get on my knees and try to defuse the situation, staying calm in the face of death. Not all of us have these skills. It saved my life. But mostly I was lucky.
Too often soldiers in Israel and policemen in America seem to shoot first, then ask questions later, or never.
It was thus amazing to watch the NYPD take a wounded but not dead Saipov into custody.
As someone committed to human life, I am glad Saipov was brought in alive. The act of hatred and terror he committed was horrific. But the US agencies that seek to prevent the next act of terror will surely benefit from him being wounded, rather than killed.
Extra-judicial killings deprive citizens of the rule of law, and cause irreparable damage to the societies that abide them.
As someone who lives in the most intensely occupied city in the West Bank, where the roads are divided between Jews and Muslims and checkpoints steadily increase, I know that it is disarmament and equality that will lead to a breaking of the cycle of violence and give all of us the chance for safety and peace.
Issa Amro is a human rights defender living in Hebron.
But Saipov himself was not among the fatalities. An NYPD officer shot at him nine times, and when a bullet hit him in the abdomen, disabling him from causing further harm, the officer stopped shooting. He will now be forced to account for his crime through the justice system.
That due process is crucial, as we saw with the Tsarnaev brothers, convicted of the attack on the Boston Marathon.
But for me, a Palestinian watching from occupied Hebron, it felt almost impossible to comprehend. The terrorist wasn’t killed on the spot? They managed to apprehend him alive?
It was surprising because it feels so antithetical to Israel’s approach.
On September 22, 2015, I watched as 18-year-old Hadeel Hashlamon walked through the metal detector at the checkpoint entrance to Shuhada Street in Hebron. She pulled out her bag from under her hijab for the soldier to search. When instructed that she would be searched further, and knowing that it would be by a man, she turned around to exit at the back of the checkpoint. Quickly and without any reason I could see, a soldier pointed his rifle at her.
Moments later she was lying dead in a pool of blood on the ground of the checkpoint, just a few feet from the exit. She was shot with 10 bullets and then left there without any medical treatment.
The soldiers claimed she tried to stab them, though they never produced a knife. And because we have pictures of the incident, we know what actually happened: A terrified woman was killed as she tried to navigate another day of checkpoints, guns, searches and humiliation.
But even if she had tried to stab the soldier as they claimed, did the heavily protected and armed soldiers need to shoot to kill? Could they not just as easily have taken her into custody, utilizing any of the many non-lethal weapons and techniques available to Israeli soldiers?
Extra-judicial killings don’t only deprive the suspect of their right to due process – a crucial feature to any functioning democracy. They deprive the society itself of justice, without which no one’s rights are truly protected.
While sometimes there is an imminent and present threat of death that needs to be met with fatal force, Hadeel’s alleged crime was not that. If she were guilty of a crime, she should have been tried, not killed.
And the use of fatal force should be transparently investigated in every civilian case. Meanwhile, the soldier who killed Hadeel remains free. He has never been arrested, tried or held accountable in any way for the deadly shooting of a civilian.
Not long after Hadeel’s killing, in March 2016, Alor Azaria was caught on camera shooting Abdel Fattah al-Sharif dead as he was lying on the ground, wounded and unable to move. Abdel, 21 had approached the Tel Rumeida military post with the purpose of carrying out a knife attack. He had already been shot and wounded and was totally immobilized when Azaria walked over to thim and shot him dead. In contrast to Palestinian children who receive up to five years in military prison for simply throwing stones, Azaria received only an 18 month prison sentence. Rallies were held across Israel in support of him. Since beginning his prison term, he has been furloughed to spend Jewish holidays with his family. In September, his sentence was reduced from 18 to 14 months.
I myself almost lost my life to an extrajudicial killing. I was near the Shuhada Street checkpoint by the Beit Hadasah settlement when a settler lied, telling the soldiers that I had a knife.
They probably knew it was a lie. Israeli soldiers in Hebron are regularly briefed on me and my tried and tested commitment to pure nonviolence. Nevertheless, at the first excuse, the soldiers cocked their weapons to shoot.
I was terrified, knowing what was likely to come. I was sure I was about to die. I quickly lowered myself to my knees in the hope they would not shoot me. I talked to them in Hebrew, using a calm, submissive tone.
“I have nothing hidden on my back. I have no weapon. I have no weapon anywhere,” I said over and over.
These are Occupation survival skills — being fluent in Hebrew, knowing to get on my knees and try to defuse the situation, staying calm in the face of death. Not all of us have these skills. It saved my life. But mostly I was lucky.
Too often soldiers in Israel and policemen in America seem to shoot first, then ask questions later, or never.
It was thus amazing to watch the NYPD take a wounded but not dead Saipov into custody.
As someone committed to human life, I am glad Saipov was brought in alive. The act of hatred and terror he committed was horrific. But the US agencies that seek to prevent the next act of terror will surely benefit from him being wounded, rather than killed.
Extra-judicial killings deprive citizens of the rule of law, and cause irreparable damage to the societies that abide them.
As someone who lives in the most intensely occupied city in the West Bank, where the roads are divided between Jews and Muslims and checkpoints steadily increase, I know that it is disarmament and equality that will lead to a breaking of the cycle of violence and give all of us the chance for safety and peace.
Issa Amro is a human rights defender living in Hebron.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Forward.

Commenti
Posta un commento