COMUNICATO DELL'UNIONE DELLE ORGANIZZAZIONI ISLAMICHE IN FRANCIA بيان اتحاد المنظمات الاسلامية في فرنسا ATTAQUES TERRORISTES A PARIS
Des explosions, des fusillades et une prise d'otages viennent d'arriver
ou sont encore en cours dans Paris et sa région. La piste terroriste
est privilégiée.
Des dizaines de morts sont actuellement comptabilisés ainsi qu’une centaine de blessés.
L'UOIF est horrifiée et très choquée par ces attaques infâmes qui sèment le chaos et la peur.
L'UOIF condamne avec la plus grande fermeté ces actes terroristes qui ont touché la France lors de moments de rassemblements.
L'UOIF tient à exprimer sa très grande émotion et sa pleine communion avec la nation.
Le Président de la République a rappelé avec force l’importance de
l’unité de la nation face à ces attaques terroristes sans précédent. il a
également rappelé la mobilisation des forces de police afin
d'appréhender les terroristes et tous les complices.
L’UOIF s'associe à la douleur des proches des victimes ainsi qu'à celle de tout le peuple français.
Le bilan provisoire est absolument dramatique. L'UOIF espère que la
prise d'otages connaîtra un dénouement sans aucune victime.
Uoif-13-11-2015.
Apprendiamo con profondo senso di
sdegno, dolore e tristezza degli orribili attentati di Parigi, di fronte
a questo orrore il nostro pensiero e la nostra vicinanza vanno alle
vittime, ai feriti, alle loro famiglie e ai loro cari e alla Francia
intera. La nostra condanna è assoluta a ogni violenza e a ogni
spargimento di sangue. In questi momenti ribadiamo l’importanza di
rafforzare lo spirito di unità e di coesione all’interno delle nostre
società; facciamo quindi appello alle istituzioni, alla società civile,
alle comunità religiose, ai mezzi di informazione e a tutta la
cittadinanza di fare fronte comune di fronte a questa barbarie, non
diamo spazio a chi vuole fomentare l’odio, il fanatismo e il rifiuto
dell’altro.
PSM – Partecipazione e Spiritualità Musulmana
Milano, 14 Novembre 2015
4 Manifestazione a Milano
Condanniamo il terrorismo dell’Isis
in modo chiaro e inequivocabile, il concetto di guerra santa non ci
appartiene. E questa presa di distanza non è la “nostra”, ma è quella
dei cittadini di Milano di cui facciamo parte». Le parole di Davide
Piccardo del Caim (Coordinamento associazioni islamiche milanesi) sono
il momento centrale del messaggio dei musulmani alla città: «Siamo tutti
accomunati dai principi della Costituzione italiana». Gli islamici di
Milano (ma non soltanto) si sono radunati ieri in serata in piazza
Affari per una fiaccolata «contro il terrorismo e contro l’Isis», come
recita il manifesto dell’iniziativa promossa dalla web radio
Dirittozero. Un paio di centinaia di persone, molti i giovani e ancor di
più le giovanissime donne, hanno bruciato fiaccole e liberato
palloncini bianchi con la scritta «No Isis». Soprattutto si sono
succeduti al microfono per pronunciare parole nette contro il
terrorismo.
No alla violenza
Emoziona
molto l’intervento di Chaimaa Fatihi, 21 anni, minuta e sorridente
sotto il velo, al primo anno di giurisprudenza a Modena: «Noi siamo
contrari a ogni forma di violenza e intolleranza religiosa. Noi
condanniamo e deprechiamo ogni forma, anche mascherata di antisemitismo,
di persecuzione religiosa, ogni parola d’odio, ogni giustificazione
della superiorità della razza o di inferiorità per motivo religioso, di
sesso, di convinzione politica». E ancora, nel silenzio assoluto
interrotto solo dagli applausi: «Noi rifiutiamo ogni estremismo e
soprattutto il Nazismo, le sue camere degli orrori, le sue ideologie
mostruose. Quell’orrore è qui che ci minaccia ancora. I criminali
dell’Isis sono qui, loro sono i nuovi nazisti. Usano la fede che non gli
appartiene per compiere atti ignobili». In piazza c’è anche Gad Lerner,
che si è prodigato nei giorni scorsi per dare visibilità
all’iniziativa: «È importante questa condanna senza eufemismi e
reticenze - commenta - noi della sinistra degli anni ‘70 sappiamo cosa
significhi non prendere nettamente le distanze dai “compagni che
sbagliano”.
I partiti
E
invece queste persone hanno coraggio a presentarsi qui con i loro volti
e a chiamare l’Isis per nome». Alla manifestazione hanno aderito anche
la Comunità di Sant’Egidio, il Pd e il Psi. «Questa di fatto è la prima
manifestazione milanese contro l’Isis e l’hanno promossa proprio i
musulmani, fa notare l’assessore alle Politiche sociali Pierfrancesco
Majorino. «Oggi abbiamo sentito la voce chiara dell’Islam», aggiunge al
microfono Stefanio Boeri. «Not in my name», grida un’altra giovanissima
oratrice in jeans polo, un filo di trucco e nessun velo, prima che Hamza
Piccardo, legga una dolorosa «lettera a un decapitato». Poi i più
giovani inscenano un flash mob: che si conclude - sulle note di One
degli U2 - con il rogo della bandiera nera dell’Isis».
WASHINGTON
(RNS) More than 120 Muslim scholars from around the world joined an
open letter to the “fighters and followers” of the Islamic State,…
huffingtonpost.com
WASHINGTON (RNS) More than
120 Muslim scholars from around the world joined an open letter to the
“fighters and followers” of the Islamic State, denouncing them as
un-Islamic by using the most Islamic of terms. Relying heavily on
the Quran, the 18-page letter released Wednesday (Sept. 24) picks apart
the extremist ideology of the militants who have left a wake of brutal
death and destruction in their bid to establish a transnational Islamic
state in Iraq and Syria. Even translated into English, the letter
will still sound alien to most Americans, said Nihad Awad, executive
director of the Council of American-Islamic Relations, who released it
in Washington with 10 other American Muslim religious and civil rights
leaders. “The letter is written in Arabic. It is using heavy
classical religious texts and classical religious scholars that ISIS has
used to mobilize young people to join its forces,” said Awad, using one
of the acronyms for the group. “This letter is not meant for a liberal
audience.” Even mainstream Muslims, he said, may find it difficult to understand. Awad
said its aim is to offer a comprehensive Islamic refutation,
“point-by-point,” to the philosophy of the Islamic State and the
violence it has perpetrated. The letter’s authors include well-known
religious and scholarly figures in the Muslim world, including Sheikh
Shawqi Allam, the grand mufti of Egypt, and Sheikh Muhammad Ahmad
Hussein, the mufti of Jerusalem and All Palestine. A translated
24-point summary of the letter includes the following: “It is forbidden
in Islam to torture”; “It is forbidden in Islam to attribute evil acts
to God”; and “It is forbidden in Islam to declare people non-Muslims
until he (or she) openly declares disbelief.” This is not the
first time Muslim leaders have joined to condemn the Islamic State. The
chairman of the Central Council of Muslims in Germany, Aiman Mazyek, for
example, last week told the nation’s Muslims that they should speak out
against the “terrorist and murderers” who fight for the Islamic State
and who have dragged Islam “through the mud.” But the Muslim
leaders who endorsed Wednesday’s letter called it an unprecedented
refutation of the Islamic State ideology from a collaboration of
religious scholars. It is addressed to the group’s self-anointed leader,
Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi, and “the fighters and followers of the
self-declared ‘Islamic State.’” But the words “Islamic State” are
in quotes, and the Muslim leaders who released the letter asked people
to stop using the term, arguing that it plays into the group’s unfounded
logic that it is protecting Muslim lands from non-Muslims and is
resurrecting the caliphate — a state governed by a Muslim leader that
once controlled vast swaths of the Middle East. “Please stop
calling them the ‘Islamic State,’ because they are not a state and they
are not a religion,” said Ahmed Bedier, a Muslim and the president of
United Voices of America, a nonprofit that encourages minority groups to
engage in civic life. President Obama has made a similar point,
referring to the Islamic State by one of its acronyms — “the group known
as ISIL” — in his speech to the United Nations earlier Wednesday. In
that speech, Obama also disconnected the group from Islam. Enumerating
its atrocities — the mass rape of women, the gunning down of children,
the starvation of religious minorities — Obama concluded: “No God
condones this terror.” Here is the executive summary of their letter: 1.
It is forbidden in Islam to issue fatwas without all the necessary
learning requirements. Even then fatwas must follow Islamic legal theory
as defined in the Classical texts. It is also forbidden to cite a
portion of a verse from the Qur’an—or part of a verse—to derive a ruling
without looking at everything that the Qur’an and Hadith teach related
to that matter. In other words, there are strict subjective and
objective prerequisites for fatwas, and one cannot ‘cherry-pick’
Qur’anic verses for legal arguments without considering the entire
Qur’an and Hadith. 2. It is forbidden in Islam to issue legal rulings about anything without mastery of the Arabic language. 3. It is forbidden in Islam to oversimplify Shari’ah matters and ignore established Islamic sciences. 4.
It is permissible in Islam [for scholars] to differ on any matter,
except those fundamentals of religion that all Muslims must know. 5. It is forbidden in Islam to ignore the reality of contemporary times when deriving legal rulings. 6. It is forbidden in Islam to kill the innocent. 7.
It is forbidden in Islam to kill emissaries, ambassadors, and
diplomats; hence it is forbidden to kill journalists and aid workers. 8.
Jihad in Islam is defensive war. It is not permissible without the
right cause, the right purpose and without the right rules of conduct. 9. It is forbidden in Islam to declare people non-Muslim unless he (or she) openly declares disbelief. 10. It is forbidden in Islam to harm or mistreat—in any way—Christians or any ‘People of the Scripture’. 11. It is obligatory to consider Yazidis as People of the Scripture. 12. The re-introduction of slavery is forbidden in Islam. It was abolished by universal consensus. 13. It is forbidden in Islam to force people to convert. 14. It is forbidden in Islam to deny women their rights. 15. It is forbidden in Islam to deny children their rights. 16. It is forbidden in Islam to enact legal punishments (hudud) without following the correct procedures that ensure justice and mercy. 17. It is forbidden in Islam to torture people. 18. It is forbidden in Islam to disfigure the dead. 19. It is forbidden in Islam to attribute evil acts to God. 20. It is forbidden in Islam to destroy the graves and shrines of Prophets and Companions. 21.
Armed insurrection is forbidden in Islam for any reason other than
clear disbelief by the ruler and not allowing people to pray. 22. It is forbidden in Islam to declare a caliphate without consensus from all Muslims. 23. Loyalty to one’s nation is permissible in Islam. 24. After the death of the Prophet, Islam does not require anyone to emigrate anywhere. Read the full letter here.
I am a Muslim. As a Muslim, I wish to pay my respect to those Parisians who lost their lives on
that terrifying night on November 13. As a Muslim, I wish to express my
condolences to all those who have lost a loved one during this diabolic
attack in Paris. As a Muslim, I wish to express my solidarity with the
French people suffering now the trauma of this murderous mayhem
perpetrated on innocent people. As a Muslim, I wish to denounce any and all acts
of genocidal, homicidal, and suicidal violence, anywhere in the world;
and in particular, I wish to denounce the criminal gangs gathered under
the flag of "Islamic State" or any other similar group terrorising
innocent people from India, Afghanistan and Pakistan to Iraq and Syria,
from North Africa to Turkey, and from the Arab and Muslim world to
Europe and the US.
World leaders condemn deadly attacks in Paris
I wish to ask, can a Muslim today say that she or
he is a Muslim, and then say what I just said? Am I - and millions of
other Muslims like me - allowed to express our sympathies, solidarities,
and sorrows on this horrific occasion, and do so from the innermost
depth of our humanities as Muslims? Talk of values In a speech expressing his solidarity and sympathy with the French, US President Barack Obama said, "This
is an attack not just on Paris, its attack not just on the people of
France, but this is an attack on all of humanity and the universal
values that we share." Of course, the attack on the French is an attack
on humanity, but is an attack on a Lebanese, an Afghan, a Yazidi, a
Kurd, and Iraqi, a Somali, or a Palestinian any less an attack "on
all of humanity and the universal values that we share"? What is it
exactly that a North American and a French share that the rest of
humanity are denied sharing? Live blog: Paris attacks In his speech, UK Prime Minister David Cameron, speaking as a European, was emphaticabout
"our way of life", and then addressing the French he added, "Your
values are our values, your pain is our pain, your fight is our fight,
and together, we will defeat these terrorists." What exactly are these French and British values?
Can-may, a Muslim share them too - while a Muslim? Or must she or he
first denounce being a Muslim and become French or British before
sharing those values? Civilisational other These are loaded terms, civilisational terms, and
culturally coded registers. Both Obama and Cameron opt to choose terms
that decidedly and deliberately turn me and millions of Muslims like me
to their civilisational other.
Today, Muslims have replaced those Jews and become the civilisational
other of Europe, and these heads of states, Obama and Cameron, on this
particularly traumatic moment in Paris, perpetuate that demonisation by
casting Muslims as Muslims outside the purview of humanity.
They make it impossible for me to remain the
Muslim that I am and join them and millions of other people in the US
and the UK and the EU in sympathy and solidarity with the suffering of
the French. As a Muslim I defy their provincialism, and I
declare my sympathy and solidarity with the French; and I do so,
decidedly, pointedly, defiantly, as a Muslim. When Arabs or Muslims die in the hands of the
selfsame criminal Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) gangs in
Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, or Lebanon, they are reduced to their lowest
common denominator and presumed sectarian denominations, overcoming and
camouflaging our humanity. But when French or British or US citizens are
murdered, they are raised to their highest common abstractions and
become the universal icons of humanity at large. Why? Are we Muslims not human? Does the murder of one of us not constitute harm to the entire body of humanity? I am who I am Some 400 years ago, in his Merchant of Venice,
William Shakespeare turned the internally demonised other of the
European Christianity - the European Jew - into a figure of defiance
against systematic stigmatisation and allowed his Shylock character to
cry out loud: "I am a Jew. Hath not a Jew eyes? Hath not a Jew hands, organs, dimensions, senses, affections, passions? Fed with the same food, hurt with the same weapons, subject to the same diseases, healed by the same means, warmed and cooled by the same winter and summer, as a Christian is? If you prick us, do we not bleed? If you tickle us, do we not laugh? If you poison us, do we not die?" Also read: Paris and the new normal
Today, Muslims have replaced those Jews and become the civilisational
other of Europe, and these heads of states - Obama and Cameron - on
this particularly traumatic moment in Paris, perpetuate that
demonisation by casting Muslims as Muslims outside the purview of
humanity. By doing so, they are making it impossible for
Muslims to remain Muslims and join in the universal march of humanity
against the barbarity of ISIL or any other murderous act of homicide.
Why? I refuse to allow them or anyone else to alienate me from who I am. Also read: Kneejerk finger-pointing after Paris attacks
I am a man. I am a Muslim. I am a human being - and, precisely, as
all of those and remaining true to who I am, I wish to join the march of
humanity on every corner of this fragile earth against barbarism. Please, President Obama and Prime Minster Cameron,
stand aside and make room for me. I wish to join the rest of humanity
and denounce this barbaric act. Would you mind? Hamid Dabashi is Hagop Kevorkian Professor of Iranian Studies and Comparative Literature at Columbia University in New York. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial policy.
Twelve years ago, I converted to Islam to
marry a Tunisian. It was a purely formal conversion. I remained
fundamentally agnostic until 20 months ago, I experienced a spiritual
revelation, started to believe in God and to practise my religion of
adoption.
We must take the lead in fighting and hunting down extremists, not
just beside, but ahead of, our Christian, and Jewish brothers and
sisters.
In the wake of the
Charlie Hebdo attacks earlier this year, I felt it was my duty as a
concerned Muslim citizen to express my outrage at having my religion
hijacked by mindless thugs.
With
several French Muslim theologians and intellectuals, we launched the
“Khlass le silence!” (“Enough with the silence!”) movement, which called
on French Muslims to take the lead in the struggle against the monsters
who make a sordid mockery of our religion.
Despite the emotion felt throughout France and the French Muslim community, our appeal fell largely on deaf ears.
Less than a month later I teamed up with Anwar Ibrahim, the charismatic
leader of Malaysia’s opposition; the Palestinian-Austrian theologian
Adnan Ibrahim; and a number of other authoritative Muslim figures from
all around the world.
• In pictures: A night of carnage in France's capital
Together, we argued that while our natural instinct as Muslims to
distance ourselves from the jihadists, saying that the latter have
“nothing to do with Islam”, was understandable, it was dubious
intellectually and altogether irresponsible to keep our reaction at
that.
The last serious attempt at launching a movement of
Islamic reform, led by the Egyptian Muhammad Abduh at the turn of the
20th century, ended up in failure and gave way to the creation of the
Muslim brotherhood.
To overcome the state of denial described
above and the moral decadence that is affecting many of us, nothing less
than a new movement of Islamic reform is needed.
Despite some
welcome marks of support, our calls continued to go unheeded. Our
initiative was attacked or ridiculed by many in the French Muslim
community and we were soon branded apostates by Islamic State (my
picture appeared along with death threats in their French language
propaganda magazine Dar al Islam).
Not a single Muslim leader
came to our defence in France when that happened, and barely a thousand
of our fellow Muslims manifested their support for our initiative.
On this ignominious day, the time has come for me to repeat with a
greater sense of urgency still what my cosignatories and I said earlier
this year:
“My dear Muslim brothers and sisters, it is time to
make our voices heard: we must rise up massively and tell the barbarians
who ordered, executed or condoned the acts of mass murder just
committed in Paris that from now on we will take the lead in fighting
and hunting them down, not just beside, but ahead of, our Christian,
Jewish, or agnostic brothers and sisters.
"We must do so because
Muslims are the extremists’ first victims and because we have mustered
the courage to take our responsibilities and launch a massive, global
movement for Islamic reform.
"If we do not, we must accept that
these monsters represent Islam (and us) in the face of the entire world.
With obvious consequences in many an forthcoming European election. The
choice is ours.” Felix Marquardt, founder of the Al Kawakibi Foundation and of the think tank youthonomics #enoughwiththesilence
9
La Bosnia-Erzegovina risponde così agli attentati di Parigi:
per onorare le vittime, lunedì 16 novembre (oggi), alle ore 12 verranno
sincronizzati i 1600 minareti del Paese e verrà invocato Dio. Dio della
Pace e dell'amore. -Allahu Akbar- gridato contro il terrorismo ed i
terroristi che si sono appropriati di questo "slogan", tradendone il
significato.
Israele governo di estrema destra e opposizione 156 Israele opposizione civile e democratica 618 Sulla scia del colpo di stato giudiziario, le discussioni israeliane sul trasferimento all’estero non si fermano più ai gruppi di social media. In una lussureggiante valle dell’Italia nordoccidentale si stanno concretizzando idee di emigrazione collettiva – e iniziative simili stanno prendendo forma anche altrove Hilo Glazer 2 settembre 2023 1:19 IDT “Mentre il numero di ore di luce nella democrazia del loro paese continua a diminuire, sempre più israeliani arrivano nella valle montuosa alla ricerca di un nuovo inizio. Tra loro ci sono giovani con bambini nel marsupio, altri con bambini in età scolare, e ci sono persone con i capelli grigi come me. Un insegnante, un imprenditore tecnologico, uno psicologo, un toelettatore, un allenatore di basket. Alcuni dicono che stanno solo esplorando, ma si vergognano ancora di ammettere che stanno seriamente considerando l'opzione. Altri s...
Gaza Operazione 'Guardiano delle Mura' ARCHIVE.IS The Children in the Israel-Hamas War Who Were Killed - The New York T… They Were Only ChildrenBy Mona El-Naggar, Adam Rasgon and Mona BoshnaqMay 26, 2021 Just minutes after the war between Israel and Hamas broke out, a 5-year-old boy named Baraa al-Gharabli was killed in Jabaliya, Gaza. A 16-year-old, Mustafa Obaid, was killed in the same strike, on the evening of May.... Just minutes after the war between Israel and Hamas broke out, a 5-year-old boy named Baraa al-Gharabli was killed in Jabaliya, Gaza. A 16-year-old, Mustafa Obaid, was killed in the same strike, on the evening of May 10. Around the same time, four cousins — Yazan al-Masri, 2, Marwan al-Masri, 6, Rahaf al-Masri, 10, and Ibrahim al-Masri, 11 — were killed in Beit Hanoun, Gaza. “It was devastating,” said Mukhlis al-Masri, a cousin. “The pain for our family is indescribable.” They Were Only Children By Mona El-Naggar, Adam Rasgon and Mona Boshnaq May 26, 2021 Whe...
I CONFINI D’ISRAELE SECONDO LA BIBBIA - Limes 1. I CONFINI DELLA TERRA DI ISRAELE SPESSO richiamano l’attenzione in base all’uso geopolitico e storico che se ne fa. Gli stereotipi sui confini israeliani, generalmente, seguono due binari che definiscono lo spazio di Israele in maniera… limesonline.com Il testo sacro offre due diverse definizioni dello spazio israeliano, dalle dimensioni completamente diverse. L’origine e il senso teologico di queste versioni di Erets Yisra’el si offrono a vari usi geopolitici. Tra yerushah e achuzah . L’opinione del rabbino Rav Ovadya. di Pierpaolo Pinchas Punturello ARTICOLI , Israele , Palestina , religioni , Medio Oriente 1. I CONFINI DELLA TERRA DI ISRAELE SPESSO richiamano l’attenzione in base all’uso geopolitico e storico che se ne fa. Gli stereotipi sui confini israeliani, generalmente, seguono due binari che defi...
Israele e identità ebraica laica e religiosa articolo completo qui Traduzione sintesi I sraele può essere lo stato meglio difeso al mondo, ma l'esistenza del suo popolo si basa su un ethos di paura costante Nel suo famoso manuale per i governanti, dedicato a Lorenzo di Medici, Niccolò Machiavelli consigliò al suo principe di imparare come suscitare amore e paura nei suoi sudditi. Essere amati e temuti allo stesso tempo era il modo migliore per esercitare il potere, ma se si deve scegliere meglio essere temuti. La paura (instillata negli altri) è senza dubbio l'emozione più apprezzata dai tiranni che la usano per costruire i loro regimi. Nella sua breve storia Israele è stato coinvolto in circa 10 conflitti o guerre militari e in innumerevoli operazioni che hanno incluso bombardamenti, attacchi aerei e incursioni nel territorio. Sebbene Israele non sia l'unico paese ad essere coinvolto in conflitti prolungati , è tra i pochi stati che hanno intrapreso un conflitto ar...
Commenti
Posta un commento